PresidentialPositionsIssuesReceptionTimelineDocuments

Work in progress — cycles are added one at a time. Every quote is machine-verified against an archived source; follow the links to read it.

1932 › Albert C. Ritchie (Democratic) › Federal responsibility for relief

States' rights and business-led recovery — no federal intervention in relief

pledge_forwarddirectional_stancereportedevidence C Federal–State RelationsRelief, Welfare & Social Insurance⚡ The Great Depression similar solutions · similar reasoning

Solution

Keep relief a state, local and private responsibility; urge programs sponsored by the business community; refuse RFC loans (Maryland took none until mid-1933).

Rationale

Federal intervention in local affairs undermines self-government; Maryland's businesslike state government could manage its own distress.

No 1932 campaign speech by Ritchie is archived; positions are reconstructed from his gubernatorial record.

Statements (2)

1932-01-01 · Governorship record as summarized by Wikipedia · pre_announcementreported ✓ verified
Governor Ritchie was a stalwart opponent of federal intervention in local affairs, and continued to urge programs sponsored by the business community itself.
1932-01-01 · Governorship record as summarized by Wikipedia · pre_announcementreported ✓ verified
Ritchie agreed to issue state bonds to aid Baltimore, but would not borrow from President Herbert Hoover 's new Reconstruction Finance Corporation until mid-1933

Follow-through

not_applicable

Ritchie lost the nomination; Maryland accepted federal relief in 1933 and Ritchie was defeated in 1934 by an opponent promising to be 'more New Dealish.'

Enacted by others

1933-05-12Franklin D. Rooseveltstatute Federal Emergency Relief ActThe opposite of Ritchie's stance. source

Other positions on this issue

1932-ritchie-states-rights-no-federal-relief · created by claude-fable-5-1 · review: unreviewed