Work in progress — cycles are added one at a time. Every quote is machine-verified against an archived source; follow the links to read it.
1932 › Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) › Federal responsibility for relief
Federal leadership in distress relief — federal credit to states whose resources are exhausted
pledge_forwardspecific_pledgecandidate_directevidence A Federal–State RelationsRelief, Welfare & Social Insurance⚡ The Great Depression similar solutions · similar reasoning
Solution
Extend federal credit to states for unemployment relief wherever their diminishing resources make it impossible to provide for the needy; the federal government to "assume bold leadership in distress relief" while primary responsibility stays with localities.
Rationale
Washington alternated between denying that destitution existed and saying the states should handle it, "until the conscience of America demanded action"; the federal government "has always had and still has a continuing responsibility for the broader public welfare."
Position chain: Provide useful work at prevailing wages for the needy unemployed rather than a dole
Statements (11)
We advocate the extension of federal credit to the states to provide unemployment relief wherever the diminishing resources of the states makes it impossible for them to provide for the needy
That admirable document, the platform which you have adopted, is clear. I accept it 100 percent.
Blanket endorsement of every plank.
when we get the chance, the Federal Government will assume bold leadership in distress relief.
I say that while primary responsibility for relief rests with localities now, as ever, yet the Federal Government has always had and still has a continuing responsibility for the broader public welfare. It will soon fulfill that responsibility.
All agree that, the first responsibility for the alleviation of poverty and distress and for the care of the victims of the depression rests upon the locality
Above and beyond that duty of the States the national Government has a responsibility.
In other words, my friends, our long-range objective is not a dole, but a job.
I not only reaffirm it, I go a step further and say that where the State itself is unable successfully to fulfill this obligation which lies upon it, it then becomes the positive duty of the Federal Government to step in to help.
I believe that there are many ways in which such reduction of expenditures can take place, but I am utterly unwilling that economy should be practiced at the expense of starving people.
Let me make it perfectly clear, however, that if men or women or children are starving in the United States -- anywhere -- I regard it as a positive duty of the Government -- of the national Government if local and State Governments have not the cash --to raise by taxes whatever sums may be necessary to keep them from starvation.
As to "immediate relief," the first principle is that this Nation, this national Government, if you like, owes a positive duty that no citizen shall be permitted to starve. That means that while the immediate responsibility for relief rests, of course, with local, public and private charity, in so far as these are inadequate the States must carry on the burden, and whenever the States themselves are unable adequately to do so the Federal Government owes the positive duty of stepping into the breach.
Follow-through
kept
The Federal Emergency Relief Act (May 12, 1933) went beyond the plank: $500 million in outright grants to states, not loans, administered by Harry Hopkins; followed by the CWA and the WPA. 'Bold leadership in distress relief' is among the most fully kept promises of the campaign.
Mechanisms
| Date | Type | Name | Effect | Consistent? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1933-03-21 | message | Message on unemployment relief | I am, therefore, asking that you establish the office of Federal Relief Administrator, whose duty it will be to scan requests for grants and to check the efficiency and wisdom of their use. | yes | Message to Congress on Unemployment Relief. |
| 1933-05-07 | message | Second fireside chat on the $500 million grant | Our next step in seeking immediate relief is a grant of half a billion dollars to help the States, counties and municipalities in their duty to care for those who need direct and immediate relief. | yes | Second Fireside Chat |
| 1933-05-12 | statute | Federal Emergency Relief Act | $500 million in grants (half matching) to states. | yes | Statement on Signing the Unemployment Relief Bill. |
Assessments
FERA made direct federal money available for relief.
The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) made direct cash allocations available to states for immediate payments to the unemployed.
Other positions on this issue
- States' rights and business-led recovery — no federal intervention in relief — Albert C. Ritchie, 1932 directional_stance
- Relief through voluntary mobilization and local responsibility, with RFC loans to exhausted states — no federal dole — Herbert Hoover, 1932 specific_pledge
- A $5 billion federal appropriation for immediate relief of those in need — Norman Thomas, 1932 specific_pledge
1932-fdr-federal-relief-leadership · created by claude-fable-5-1 · review: unreviewed