Work in progress — cycles are added one at a time. Every quote is machine-verified against an archived source; follow the links to read it.
1932 › Herbert Hoover (Republican) › Adherence to the World Court
Join the World Court with reservations; make the Kellogg-Briand Pact an instrument for consultation — but no commitments to use force
pledge_forwardspecific_pledgecandidate_directevidence A Diplomacy & International InstitutionsForeign Policy similar solutions · similar reasoning
Solution
Adhere to the World Court 'under proper reservations preserving our freedom of action'; consult with other nations in emergencies under the Pact of Paris; enter 'no agreements committing us to any future course of action or which call for use of force.'
Rationale
World opinion mobilized against aggression can keep the peace without entangling commitments.
Statements (5)
We favor enactment by Congress of a measure that will authorize our government to call or participate in an international conference in case of any threat of non-fulfillment of Article 2 of the Treaty of Paris (Kellogg-Briand pact).
America should join its influence and gain a voice in this institution, which would offer us a safer, more judicial and expeditious instrument for the constantly recurring questions between us and other nations than is now available by arbitration.
I have recommended joining the World Court under proper reservations preserving our freedom of action. Above all, we have given leadership in the transforming of the Kellogg-Briand Pact from an inspiring outlawry of war to an organized instrument for peaceful settlements backed by definite mobilized world public opinion against aggression. We shall, under the spirit of that pact, consult with other nations in time of emergency to promote world peace. We shall enter into no agreements committing us to any future course of action or which call for use of force in order to preserve peace.
We properly refuse to entangle ourselves in age-old controversies in other parts of the world. Our face is turned forward, not backward. We have taken the position that we will not participate in trying to compel people to engage in the settlement of controversies by the use of force.
I have made but one reservation, and that is, we will join no movement that proposes to use military or economic force in its attempts to prevent war. For that is a contradiction in method.
Follow-through
not_applicable
Hoover lost the election; the pledge could not be tested in office. Roosevelt's 1935 World Court attempt failed in the Senate; no consultation statute was enacted.
Other positions on this issue
- Adhere to the World Court; arbitration of disputes; consultation to enforce the Kellogg-Briand Pact — Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 specific_pledge
1932-hoover-world-court-kellogg-pact-consultation · created by claude-fable-5-1 · review: unreviewed