Work in progress — cycles are added one at a time. Every quote is machine-verified against an archived source; follow the links to read it.
1932 › Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) › Level of military spending
An adequate Army and Navy without a near-billion-dollar peacetime burden
pledge_forwarddirectional_stanceparty_platformevidence A Federal Budget & SpendingDefense & Military similar solutions · similar reasoning
Solution
Base the size of the Army and Navy on a fact survey of the existing establishments so that peacetime defense spending, "fast approaching a billion dollars annually," is reduced.
Rationale
Peacetime military expenditure is part of the excessive cost of government.
Statements (2)
We advocate a Navy and an Army adequate for national defense, based on a survey of all facts affecting the existing establishments, that the people in time of peace may not be burdened by an expenditure fast approaching a billion dollars annually.
That admirable document, the platform which you have adopted, is clear. I accept it 100 percent.
Blanket endorsement of every plank.
Follow-through
reversed
Instead of cutting the near-billion-dollar defense establishment, Roosevelt allotted $238 million of NIRA public-works money to warship construction in June 1933 and signed the Vinson-Trammell Act (March 1934) authorizing a treaty-strength navy — the largest peacetime naval program to that date. Army spending fell briefly under the Economy Act, then rose.
Mechanisms
| Date | Type | Name | Effect | Consistent? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1933-06-16 | budget | NIRA public-works allotment for 32 warships | $238 million from Title II funds. | no | Carl Vinson - Wikipedia |
| 1934-03-27 | statute | Vinson-Trammell Act | In 1934, Vinson helped push the Vinson-Trammell Act, along with Democratic senator Park Trammell of Florida . The bill authorized the replacement of obsolete vessels by new construction and a gradual increase of ships within the limits of the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and London Naval Treaty of 1930. | no | Carl Vinson - Wikipedia |
Obstruction
war Japanese expansion after Manchuria and the collapse of the Geneva conference reversed the disarmament premise of the plank.
Assessments
Naval construction was accelerated, not reduced.
This was necessary, as per the Naval History and Heritage Command (the U.S. Navy's historical office), relatively few major warships were laid down in the US Navy during the Hoover administration , and the US Navy was both aging and losing ground to the Japanese Navy .
1932-fdr-military-spending-cut · created by claude-fable-5-1 · review: unreviewed