Work in progress — cycles are added one at a time. Every quote is machine-verified against an archived source; follow the links to read it.
1932 › Newton D. Baker (Democratic) › League of Nations and international organizations
Do not make the League of Nations a party issue; no entry until a majority of Americans approve
pledge_forwardspecific_pledgecandidate_directevidence A Diplomacy & International InstitutionsForeign Policy similar solutions · similar reasoning
Solution
Having long advocated American membership in the League, Baker declared (January 26, 1932) that he would not favor a League plank and would not put the United States in the League until convinced a majority approved.
Rationale
'I think it would be a great mistake to make a partisan issue of the League of Nations.' A tactical retreat to remain available as a compromise nominee.
Roosevelt made a parallel disavowal of the League on February 2, 1932 under Hearst pressure; both are cases of a candidate reversing a long-held position to become nominable.
Statements (2)
I think it would be a great mistake to make a par
Direct quotation; OCR truncates at a column break.
But his statement yesterday that he would not favor a League plank in the party platform and that he would not, if he could, put the United States in the League until convinced a majority of the American people approved such a step, revived to some ex tent speculation as to his can didacy.
Follow-through
not_applicable
Baker was never nominated; the 1932 platform omitted the League and the United States never joined.
Other positions on this issue
- Join the League and World Court; lead general disarmament; free the Philippines; withdraw from Nicaragua, Haiti and China; recognize the Soviet Union — Norman Thomas, 1932 specific_pledge
1932-baker-league-not-partisan-issue · created by claude-fable-5-1 · review: unreviewed